Following is the procedure for project proposal bank
- The interested empanelled development partners of Development Labs — Centre for Public Policy and Governance are required to submit project proposals in the very detailed template already prepared by the Development Labs — Centre for Public Policy and Governance.
- Each development partner is allowed to submit only one proposal, for a thematic and geographical area for which it is empanelled (the empanelment certificate that mentions the geographical and thematic area of empanelment must be attached with the application).
- Even if the organization is empanelled in multiple thematic/geographical areas , it can submit only one proposal.
Each development partner making a project proposal submission towards the project proposal bank will also have to submit a processing fee of Rs. 3000/- at the time of submission
(this fee is applicable to all submissions, irrespective of whether the proposal is eventually placed in the bank).
- The first level of review of the submitted proposals would be by select team members of the Hub under the supervision of Head, Project Proposal Bank, Ananya Samajdar.
- Proposals that are found to be possessing significant shortcomings such as lack of consistency with legal provisions, absence of impact orientation, non-project mode implementation, ad-hoc nature, lack of sustainability, and lack of evidence of community need will be classified by the review team as ‘not recommended in present form’.
- Clarifications/further refinement of proposals will not be requested for such proposals, though the implementing agency will be informed of the outcome and reasons for the same.
- Clarifications/further refinement will only be requested for proposals that pass the first stage of screening.
- For these proposals, Development partners will be requested to revert with requested clarifications within two weeks, to increase the likelihood of smooth and speedy processing of proposals.
A closer scrutiny will be performed only if the proposals passes the first stage of review.
This stage’s tentative timeline: one and a half months from submission of clarifications by development partner
- Financial scrutiny
- Intense Programmatic Examination by Faculty Expert/s
- Mr Batliwala (Financial Advisor, TISS) and his team examine the financial aspects of the proposal and convey comments and summary decision (recommended/not recommended) on the same to the Head of the project proposal bank.
- Simultaneously, the Head of the project proposal bank also intensively examines the proposals (and the clarifications to the areas of concern raised in the review) and also refers the same to the Faculty Mentor (Prof Sivaraju) and at the discretion of the Head of Project Proposal Bank and the Faculty Mentor, to the Faculty Expert/s specializing in the concerned sectoral area.The advice of the Faculty Mentor (and Faculty Experts) who will guide the project proposal bank will play a central role at this level of scrutiny.
- The advice of the Faculty Mentor (and Faculty Experts) who will guide the project proposal bank will play a central role at this level of scrutiny.
- This stage, may, at the discretion of the Faculty Mentor/Faculty Expert/s and Head of Proposal Bank, also involve obtaining of further clarifications/further refinement of proposal from the concerned development partner.
- Field visit will be made to the offices/project sites of the concerned development partner, only if considered necessary and appropriate by the Head of Project Proposal Bank and the Faculty Mentor.
- At the end of this level of scrutiny, outstanding proposals that meet the criteria mentioned above and are to the satisfaction of the Faculty Mentor, Faculty Expert/s and Head of Proposal Bank will be selected for placing in the bank.
- As mentioned above, the process of selection of proposals is highly selective – only outstanding proposals would be selected for placing in the bank.
- The Head of Proposal Bank would record the reasons for the selection of certain proposals, and also the reasons for not selecting proposals.